Gender Communication Research And Discussion Assignment - 2475 Words

Gender Communication Research And Discussion Assignment (Essay Sample) Content: GENDER COMMUNICATIONStudents NameInstitutional AffiliationIntroductionThere have been a number of researches done based on our daily day to day living addressing the issue of gender communication. Over the years there have been misconceptions about the above topic. There is a belief that women and men can effectively communicate as long as they understand the underlying invisible rules that control how both genders communicate. There has been a number of coverage on the idea that males and females communicate differently. This idea has been exaggerated as people often say that men and women both come from different planets. However, the two genders seem to have different sets of rules in whenever they are explaining the same thing. Behavior that might seem acceptable and right by one gender may be misinterpreted by the other gender as wrong or even hurtful. Whenever this happens there is the possibility of one gender being defensive and also intolerant and this can be traced to their own personal interpretation and it has been established that these interpretations are mostly based on an individual's gender. According to recent studies, women have been seen to read more into situations and statements as compared to their male counterparts (Kimbrough, 2013). Both genders have different communication styles and they all depend on an individual's background in terms of education and where they were brought up. Generally, the style that both men and women have been known to use can be identified as debate vs. relate or competitive vs. cooperative. There is the issue of gender difference emerging from the social and professional; societal setting. In a conversation, however, the line between being professional or social can hardly be identified (Zimmermann, 2014).DiscussionThe artifact used in this analysis is based on an exchange interview between two gentlemen Charlemagne The god, Andrew Schulz and a lady by the name Angela Rye. They are all addres sing the same issue on gender and how famous people get double standards as far as this issue is concerned, but there are a number of occasions where they all disagree on something due to the different interpretation by each one of them. The show titled the "the brilliant idiots" is an audio recording posted regularly on sound cloud whereby these individuals could hand situations that related top the current affairs and affecting the society, it was recorded in Los-Angels California they are all addressing several issues but the main point of discussion is based on how an artists can get away with using misogyny and demeaning women in public but politicians or either business people will be held accountable if they seem to utter a word that seems to be disrespecting women as less sexual objects (Brownell,2015). In Andrews's argument he was reacting to the fact that he tweeted about an occurrence when a rap group named Migos was invited at to a T.V talk show while their hit song and the key highlight of that show seem to be biased and depicting women as sexual toys and only there to be used by the males. The other victim was Milos who has been accused praising pedophiles and seems to use comedy as an excuse for making such a bad joke.Before Angela arrived Andrew was trying to explain that he puts Milos and the rappers Migos at the same level due to their disrespectful remarks on women and gender-based violence. However, his problem is the fact that t6he rappers get away with it based on the excuse that they are just rappers and their choice of words should be excused. He gets attacked on social media for bringing up this issue by the same women that he was trying to defend and protect. In his defense, he feels like there are double standards whenever different people are accused of the same crime. Why is it that the Rappers are not heavily criticized yet there reference to women seems to be offensive and disrespectful? According to Charlemagne, the two operate on different levels and since they are just a bunch of Rappers based in Atlanta there is no need to judge them harshly since they are just doing it for the records and probably means no harm. But on the other hand, Andrew defends his position on the fact that their choices of words are disrespectful and still should be viewed as offensive just as Milos sentiments. In such a case the two will not come to a conclusive agreement because each of them has a different interpretation of the two case scenarios. According to Andrew, he was surprised by the fact that even the same women he was defending were against him. He came under constant attack on twitter and he couldn't understand why women were comfortable being referred to as sexual puppets in a very disrespectful manner yet when he points it out, he gets to be the bad guy.This is a clear case where the women have portrayed their ability to try and establish intimacy through discussing a problem and trying to relate to some of the as pects of the problem that seem to be affecting them directly. In most cases women have bee accused of not having a broader look and all they do is focus on the moment. If they were more concerned about the future they would have been worried about their children growing in an environment where name calling is no longer a big deal. But since that does not affect them, they tend to ignore the fact that the future generation will do the same by following their steps and women will end up loosing all the respect they had just because they did not relate to this issues (Brownell,2015).Men just like Andrew have been characterized with handling a problem face to face and coming up with a very straight forward and immediate solution with some long term strategy that will help fix the problem permanently. This is the point where the two genders often disagree, men are meant to deal with a problem and get done with it but women will firsts analyze the underlying circumstances and gather enoug h information that will lead to a well thought and precise solution which will be based on not just opinions but facts that have been well collected and have directly affected the case under scrutiny.This is a clear case where the women have portrayed their ability to try and establish intimacy through discussing a problem and trying to relate to some of the aspects of the problem that seem to be affecting them directly. In most cases, women have bee accused of not having a broader look and all they do is focus on the moment. If they were more concerned about the future they would have been worried about their children growing in an environment where name calling is no longer a big deal. But since that does not affect them, they tend to ignore the fact that the future generation will do the same by following their steps and women will end up loosing all the respect they had just because they did not relate to this issues.Men just like Andrew have been characterized with handling a p roblem face to face and coming up with a very straightforward and immediate solution with some long-term strategy that will help fix the problem permanently. This is the point where the two genders often disagree, men are meant to deal with a problem and get done with it but women will firsts analyze the underlying circumstances and gather enough information that will lead to a well thought and precise solution which will be based on not just opinions but facts that have been well collected and have directly affected the case under scrutiny.Therefore the women that have disagreed with Andrews's opinion on the fact that the rappers disrespected women must have tried to look at the song as an entertaining entity that doesn't mean anything just a couple of beats and words that don't carry any meaning. The excuse was that the artist does not specify which girl they are disrespecting and since the women listening to the music are not directly mentioned, then they won't be offended. Howev er, if a specific name was mentioned then the women would criticize the song since it would be easier for them to relate to the content being shared on the song. Therefore in order for women to react to some of this content being shared by the media, they need to have a clear picture of the information being communicated at that exact moment. As a result, most of them do not react even to abusive songs and languages since by the time they are through analyzing which part affected them a new style has already come up. Women have also been known to defend some of the men who have treated them unfairly and such actions give the men an upper hand and most of them take advantage of this (Case, 2013).Communication ConceptsThere are a number of communication concepts that can be identified and play a major role in all the communication processes. A message can be identified as an uninterrupted utterance that can be delivered verbally or nonverbally. In order for there to be any information , there is the need for one to give a message and it is the message that determines the need for a response and the level of that response will be determined by the content of the message. The response is also determined by how the recipient receives and interprets the message. If the message is not well interested then there is the possibility of getting the wrong response. For example, Andrew had sent out a message that most people tend to get away with things such as openly disrespecting women just because they are celebrities. His issue was based on the fact that Migos can openly disrespect women and won't take fault of that just because they are artists or rather as he referred the as "Gangster Rappers". In this case, the people seem to have misinterpreted his message and forget that he is using Migos as an example since other artists out there have been able to get away with awful acts just because they are talented and the general public loves them. In ...